Prohibitions against prescribing hydroxychloroquine to COVID-19 patients is the smoking gun that makes those behind these measures prime suspects in a conspiracy of mass murder never before seen in Western nations.
To add insult to injury, the censorship of those who are eyewitnesses to the crime – front line doctors everywhere – is an act of injustice so profound that it staggers the imagination.
Just ask Dr. Simone Gold, who led a team of doctors speaking out during a Capitol Hill media conference. The conference was removed from various major social media sites, and worse, Dr. Gold was fired for having participated in the conference in the first place. Continue reading »
Comments Off on 666 – COVID-19’s ethical cancer – the morality of altruism
An end to the COVID-19 pandemic will never be found through some future means of defeating the SARS CoV-2 virus. That’s because the COVID-19 pandemic is a politically orchestrated moral pandemic, not a viral one.
Thanks to continued unnecessary lockdowns, the forced wearing of masks and social distancing rules, we now know that our politicians can force arbitrary and irrational restrictions on us without being held accountable for their actions. But worse, we also now know that there are a great many people not only willing to follow their orders without question, but who are eager to help enforce those orders against their fellow citizens.
This is beyond tragedy. At the root of this acceptance of evil lies a widely accepted belief that these actions can all be justified by altruism. “If it only saves one life, it’s all worth it.”
This is a demonstrably immoral argument. For any society this represents an ethical cancer, which just like any cancer if left unchecked eventually destroys the host body. No society can possibly survive on the irrational principle of self-sacrifice.
Nor can any number of COVID-19 ‘model projections,’ or slogans insisting that “we’re all in this together,” possibly justify the suicidal path taken by our politicians and health care officials.
Their prescriptions, all based on unethical manifestations of the Left, have been designed to defeat human nature itself. What’s required is a moral prescription that’s Just Right – one that defends human nature instead of attempting to defeat it.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
More than being a demonstrated lifesaving treatment in fighting the COVID-19 virus (SARS CoV-2), hydroxychloroquine has now become a symbol of the fundamental political divide regarding the government-mandated lockdown.
Donald Trump’s recent announcement that he is personally using hydroxychloroquine was a direct challenge to negative mainstream media narratives about the drug. It was also a direct attack against those on the Left determined to keep the COVID-19 lockdown in effect for as long as possible, no matter how many people may die or suffer in the process.
In many jurisdictions around the world, it may appear that the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown is slowly ending, but the reality is that it is incrementally being extended – indefinitely – as politicians seek to entrench their recently exercised undemocratic powers over the rest of us. Political threats to repeatedly shut down areas of the economy on the basis of future COVID-19 statistics means that the economy may never be able to recover.
Tragically, at the root of all the shutdown strategies lies a single priority: the protection of healthcare ‘systems,’ a priority placed above that of protecting the lives of the people forced to deal with those systems. When the pandemic began, ‘flattening the curve’ to prevent hospitals from being overrun was the first and only stated objective of the shutdown. Today, the continued rationale for the shutdown is anybody’s guess, as it can change by the hour, and often does. But the priority hasn’t changed even though politicians insist their motivations are based on ‘saving lives.’
By placing the public spotlight on his use of hydroxychloroquine, Trump boldly demonstrated how ‘saving lives’ is not the goal of the mainstream media or the Left. Once again, Trump brilliantly did what was Just Right: he exposed the hypocrisy of those who claim to be motivated by ‘saving lives’ while simultaneously opposed to the use of that which is life-saving.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
Comments Off on 655 – Pandemic government and the virus of altruism
On coronavirus, the contrast between what we’ve been told by the official medical establishment and a growing number of front-line health care professionals can no longer be avoided.
In fact, it appears that much of the advice promoted by our politicians and medical bureaucrats is diametrically opposed to that being given by many doctors and virologists directly involved with, and on, the frontlines of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Most confusing are the polarized opinions regarding ‘social distancing’ and the wearing of ‘protective’ masks.
Officialdom says social distancing and physical isolation are necessary to slow the virus, while the ‘front-liners’ say that social distancing and physical isolation actually make people more susceptible, not only to the SARS CoV-2 virus but to a whole host of other viruses and potential diseases.
Officialdom says wearing masks in public is recommended for safety whereas the ‘front-liners’ argue that wearing masks is not healthy for those who wear them. This practice, too, can lead to one becoming more vulnerable to all viruses.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 654 – The ‘not normal’ — still living under the COVID-19 lockdown
What’s being described as a possible post-COVID-19 ‘new normal’ should instead be called ‘the not normal.’
Global vaccine advocate Bill Gates insists that “Normalcy only returns when we’ve largely vaccinated the entire global population.” If so, then normalcy will never return and ‘not normal’ will be a permanent condition under which we will be forced to live.
Despite promises that a vaccine to combat SARS CoV-2 will eventually be developed, there is a growing body of expertise warning that this goal may never be reached. Among them is Doctor Judy Mikovits who works in the field of developing immune therapies: “There is no vaccine currently on the schedule for any RNA virus that works.”
For expressing these and other opinions that do not reflect the official narrative on the pandemic shutdown, many have found their voices being suppressed on social media. For example, YouTube recently removed the video featuring California doctors Erickson and Massihi from its platform, and then later removed the video featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits.Continue reading »
Who can we believe? The growing gap between projected cases of COVID-19 in statistical models and the contrary evidence being revealed by daily accumulating data is becoming impossible to ignore.
Similarly, the permanent gap between Left and Right has also become impossible to ignore. Those on the Left want the shutdown to continue indefinitely, since that serves their communist and fascist ideologies of state control, prohibition, and censorship. The COVID-19 shutdown is a Leftist’s wildest dream come true. Those on the Right insist that the shutdowns be ended, claiming that there is no longer a need to do so in light of the fact that all of the fears originally justifying them are no longer an issue.
But more and more, the COVID-19 crisis is looking like a déjà vu of the climate change crisis, the United Nations-led conspiracy to destroy capitalism on a global scale.
Indeed, the very same propaganda tactics and terminology for fighting climate change are now being used for fighting the coronavirus. For example, what were once ‘climate change deniers’ are now ‘coronavirus deniers.’ Continue reading »
Comments Off on 650 – Omnipotent State—of emergency
US President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau are moving in opposite directions when it comes to ending the COVID-19 shut down.
“This will be the new normal until a vaccine is developed,” Trudeau was quoted saying in an April 11 National Post report. If so, that would mean a minimum of one to three years, given the usual best time in which a vaccine can be developed.
In contrast, Donald Trump says “I want to get it open as soon as we can; we have to get our country open.” With May 1 targeted as his primary re-opening date, Trump has also gone on record saying he would like to see parts of the country open up even sooner than that.
With COVID-19 statistics falling far short of expectations, and looking more like average or lower than average annual flu numbers, government officials in tandem with the medical profession are warning of a second or third wave, having apparently implied that we have already been through the first wave. Continue reading »