Mark Vandermaas has begun an effort to alter the course of Canadian culture and politics one province at a time by creating the New Brunswick Freedom Project.
Inspired in part by the New Hampshire Free State Project Mark’s plan is to encourage those who value individual rights and personal freedom to move to New Brunswick and shift the province’s political compass towards more individual freedom and less socialism.
With its relatively small electorate of less than 600,000, Mark believes that any efforts to change the Canadian political environment will have a greater effect in New Brunswick than any of the more populated provinces.
Maxime Bernier’s arrest in Manitoba on June 11 was unprecedented in Canadian history and yet went virtually unreported by the legacy Canadian media. In this interview with Robert Vaughan, Mr. Bernier describes how he has been cancelled by the media for political reasons.
Also discussed is his insulting treatment by the RCMP, the recent federal court decision on the constitutionality of Justin Trudeau’s quarantine hotels, the New Brunswick government’s admission that they are indeed infringing on peoples Charter rights, and Mr. Bernier’s promise of a Royal Commission into the handling of the pandemic should his People’s Party of Canada be elected to Parliament.
This video is also available on Just Right Media’s Rumble channel here.
Talk about an adverse reaction! If there’s one clear message Canadians should take away from the arrest of Maxime Bernier last week in Manitoba, it is that the entire COVID lockdown is all about political ideology – and nothing else.
As the leader of an officially-registered federal political party in Canada – the People’s Party – Bernier’s status rivals that of the many elected politicians who routinely and openly defy lockdown mandates while demanding that others obey them. Yet these politicians are never forced to face the consequences of their actions, and the hypocrisy of their forcing citizens to obey restrictions that they themselves do not obey has far passed the point of intolerable.
Though only kept behind bars for approximately eight hours, the fact that Bernier was specifically locked up for opposing lockdowns makes his case all the more arresting. Astoundingly, the corporate mainstream media has barely mentioned the arrest, if at all, while those who are aware of these events have been referring to them as among the ‘darkest’ days in Canada’s history.
Politically, Canada is a sick nation, having succumbed to the irrationality of the Left. Whether Liberal, Conservative, New Democrat, or Green, all parties support continued lockdowns, mask mandates, and above all, universal ‘vaccinations’ that have killed and injured more people than any other vaccine in the entire accumulated history of vaccines. All parties, that is, except the People’s Party of Canada.
Given the political nature of the lockdowns, we should not be surprised by the fact that those consistently fined, charged, or arrested for violating ‘health orders’ have exclusively been those who are Just Right.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Maxime Bernier, leader of the People’s Party of Canada was arrested in the town of St. Pierre Jolys, Manitoba on June 11. Robert Vaughan discusses this dramatic event, unprecedented in Canadian history, with Professor, Salim Mansur.
“We are no longer an advanced liberal democracy, that is Canada. We have rapidly, over the past 15 months, turned into some third-world country, basically an Animal Farm, a totalitarian Animal Farm where there is one set of laws for me and another set of laws for you.” ~ Salim Mansur.
This video is also available on our Rumble channel here.
Comments Off on 707 – The principles of politics versus the politics of principle
May202021
“Freedom! Freedom! Freedom!” That has been an increasing chant heard at ever-growing protests around the world and in Canada, where Ontario’s fascist premier Doug Ford boasts that his is the most locked down jurisdiction in North America.
Sad to say, freedom has never been on the agenda of any political party found in the federal parliament or provincial legislatures of Canada. This is remarkable, given that freedom has always been touted by each of these parties as being a fundamental value of the nation. Yet freedom always takes a back seat to their various collectivist priorities – priorities that simply cannot possibly co-exist with freedom.
Tragically, most of those chanting ‘freedom’ are not really seeking individual freedom because they do not even know what freedom is. Rather, they are desperate to escape their latest version of oppression – currently a pretended ‘viral’ epidemic created to generate fear and to justify the unjustifiable – tyranny.
Though it is true that Canada lacks principled leadership, the real weakness in the Canadian fabric is not to be found in its leaders; it is to be found in Canadians themselves who routinely dismiss supporting the rare political party or politician that would put freedom first.Continue reading »
Comments Off on 705 – Winning back our freedom—and why philosophy matters
May062021
As more and more people ‘awaken’ to the tyrannical reality of the global lockdowns, a great dilemma presents itself.
No matter how many grasp the true nature of our tyranny, or publicly protest, or civilly disobey our tyrannical laws and politicians, or challenge the courts, the sad fact is that all of Canada’s political parties in the parliaments and legislatures of the country are the source of the tyranny. Without a political option that will guarantee individual freedom on principle, our tyranny will never end.
To Canadians who want an end to lockdowns and other tyrannical rules and regulations, there are currently only two political parties in the nation opposed to them on principle.
Federally, the choice is the People’s Party of Canada, under the leadership of Maxime Bernier. And provincially in the province of Ontario, it is the Freedom Party of Ontario under the leadership of Paul McKeever.
While there are a few independents and occasional members in various parliaments who have expressed opposition to the lockdowns, their opposition has not been based on the necessary philosophical principles. Instead their concern has been over issues of ‘democratic process’ or calls for more ‘accurate’ statistics and ‘scientific’ evidence, none of which could ever justify today’s tyranny.
Given these circumstances, things may seem hopeless for those yearning to win back their freedom democratically – at the ballot box. Worse, many believe that their vote would be ‘wasted’ if they voted for a party that has no elected members and whose past vote totals have been in the single digit percentage range. Without a ‘majority’ how can such parties ever win an election?
Answer: it doesn’t take a ‘majority’ of eligible voters to elect a majority government. In fact, as illustrated by Freedom Party leader Paul McKeever in his analysis of the past ten Ontario elections, the elected parties consistently received between 18.2% to 29.7% of eligible voters, most resulting in majority governments.
Given that every other elected political party in Ontario has vowed to keep the lockdowns going indefinitely (even though they have no moral or democratic right to do so), a vote for any of them is a vote for continued tyranny.
Polls are now suggesting that as many as 20% of Ontarians want their freedom back, a percentage that becomes politically significant in light of the reality of past electoral results. Unfortunately this minority is still reluctant to vote for its convictions, blinded by political myths and unaware of how easily circumstances could be reversed.
As we have demonstrated many times in the past, the political world is and has always been ruled by minorities. ‘Majorities’ always follow, they never lead.
Tyranny will never end in our society until a significant minority philosophically commits to a real political option that is always Just Right – freedom.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
Comments Off on 702 – UNDRIP and the indigenous question | Ron Vaillant
Apr152021
The sovereignty of nations is globally under attack, ironically by a group called the United Nations. The attacks are disguised in a myriad of ways, one of the lesser-known being a scheme known as UNDRIP: the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Despite its name, UNDRIP is not about addressing ‘indigenous’ concerns, but about a huge land grab that will affect every resident in Canada. Having conducted his own investigation into UNDRIP, our guest Ron Vaillant was alarmed to discover that there is no definition of ‘indigenous’ in the UN declaration, a curious omission given that the entire document is predicated on actions based on protecting ‘indigenous rights.’
He is now sounding his own alarm about Canada’s Bill C-15 and the 46 Articles of UNDRIP broadly supported by Canadian politicians in upcoming parliamentary votes.
In the inevitable confusion that abounds when essential and fundamental terms are left undefined, it is difficult to see the truth behind the cloud of distractions obscuring our view. It is an inconvenient truth that any government policies based on ‘indigenous rights’ are policies based on the collectivist principle of race and racism.
The proper grounds on which to base land claim settlements rights and governance is the principle of individual rights. It is perpetually Just Right that each individual be accorded freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, and the private property rights necessary in the exercise of such freedoms.
If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal
