Nov 122020
 


In the aftermath of the November 3 American election, U.S. president Donald Trump has been openly censored by mainstream and social media alike. Why? For announcing that election fraud played a major role in the election outcome.

This kind of censorship is simply unprecedented in American history. But more significantly, it is also evidence that Trump’s assertion is correct.

Democrats had long ago announced their intentions to reverse their own predicted Trump “landslide” victory on election night – by adding ballots for Biden to the vote count after that landslide became apparent. And this is exactly what happened.

Naturally, the mainstream media, being the key and leading component of the election fraud, is outright denying that any such fraud exists. Continue reading »

Nov 052020
 


It is difficult to persuade terrified and fearful people to even see, let alone understand, the real nature of the current pandemic that so paralyzes them – the pandemic of global fascism. Ordered to wear masks in the absence of any viral threat, and worse, in the presence of growing evidence that masks are extremely unhealthy, the vast majority of people still willingly accept their political oppression.

The entire spectacle is indeed a political masquerade of hidden intentions, its acceptance symbolized by the wearing of masks. One wonders if those wearing their masks at the COVID masquerade ball are even remotely aware that they are dancing to the death of their own freedoms.

In today’s political environment, masks are an instrument of pure political submission, and nothing more. And as an increasing number of honest health care practitioners are warning (though rarely heard thanks to censorship), the wearing of masks presents a great potential health risk, far more dangerous than the imagined viral pandemic itself.

The mainstream media, our politicians, and our health care bureaucrats are all pushing a globalist fascist agenda. In tandem, they have done everything possible to keep the public ignorant of the facts and realities behind every aspect of the COVID-19 phenomenon. Worse, they have become the primary agents of spreading false propaganda about COVID-19 and promoting the irrational regulations and rules dreamed up by politicians and bureaucrats intent on ruling us and destroying our lives and economies. And worse still is the blind acceptance – indeed eagerness – of those whose very lives are threatened, to be arbitrarily ruled by others and to have their freedoms permanently extinguished. Continue reading »

674 – Religiously defending freedom in revolutionary times

 Comments Off on 674 – Religiously defending freedom in revolutionary times
Oct 012020
 


Two Roman Catholic priests in the United States have ignited a controversy not only within their own church, but on the worldwide stage as well. Father Robert Altier (Crystal, Minnesota) and Reverend James Altman (La Crosse, Wisconsin) each expressed views to their congregations that contradicted the official Left narrative on two of the most sensitive issues to the Left: continuation of the COVID-19 lockdowns and the coming presidential election.

Altier’s sin was to proclaim that “we have been lied to” about the COVID-19 shutdowns, while Altman’s sin was to suggest that one can not be Catholic and also vote for the Democratic Party.

The controversy puts a spotlight on the unjust way Christian groups in particular have been targeted and prevented from free assembly, while public assemblies by groups on the Left are openly supported, aided and abetted. It has also exposed a philosophical conflict within the religious community that parallels that of the broader general community. Each faces its own polarized environment pitting Left against Right.

Perhaps consequently, and on a positive note, both the secular and religious Right are discovering that they have more politically in common than not. At the root of their commonality is the philosophy of freedom, a value shared by those who acknowledge that every individual has a free will and the right to exercise it.

The sooner they begin working together politically the better. Because in the end the only forces that can stop this fascist political pandemic are those that are Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Sep 172020
 


In the absence of any rational justification for them, what the continual lockdown threats and irrational rules surrounding COVID-19 clearly demonstrate is that we currently live under fascist rule. It’s no “creeping” fascism. It’s here. Now.

Like all forms of collectivism, fascism is an ideology of the Left. Generally, those on the Left support continuing the lockdowns and COVID rules while those on the Right favor freedom and individual choice. These Left versus Right competing narratives are clearly distinguishable on the basis of philosophy and ideology.

Labels continually prove to be unavoidable in political discourse because they are both a necessity and a weapon.

When correctly defined instead of being avoided, political labels can become a powerful weapon for the Right and against fascism given fascism’s exclusive association with the Left. Continue reading »

671 – The necessary polarization of Left and Right—Define or be defined

 Comments Off on 671 – The necessary polarization of Left and Right—Define or be defined
Sep 102020
 

When people object to political “polarization,” what they’re really objecting to is the right to politically disagree. Since all such disagreement is by its nature polarized, this objection itself represents a polarized political position – of the Left. It’s not surprising then that the Left-dominated mainstream media doesn’t want the world to know just how much growing opposition there actually is to the world-wide COVID-19 lockdown measures.

At least two million-plus protesters filled the streets of Berlin Germany on August 29, yet the mainstream media falsely reported their numbers in the low thousands, and dismissed the protesters as “COVID deniers.”

Of course “fake news” is nothing new. Mainstream media has been spreading fake news since the very concept of “news” itself was created. Fake news strives to create the illusion that there is no disagreement with its narrative.

The growing public resistance to the entire COVID-19 “pandemic” lockdowns and forced mask mandates has at last uncovered a political polarity that should not be condemned or resisted but celebrated and embraced.

In the world of politics, ideological electoral options are necessarily binary, leading to a natural polarization of their symbolic terms Left and Right. When objectively and correctly associated with their proper ideologies, the polarized terms of Left and Right can be used as a powerful compass making it possible to steer the ship of state in the right direction.

After all, a political compass must reliably point towards each of the polarized forces of Left and Right before that compass can guide us in the direction that’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

669 – Deference to expertise | Professor Christopher Essex

 Comments Off on 669 – Deference to expertise | Professor Christopher Essex
Aug 272020
 


“Giving one person such power is an example of the anti-democratic deference to expertise in our society.”

That warning conveyed by our guest Dr Christopher Essex, Professor, Dept of Applied Mathematics at the University of Western Ontario, came after observing that “they are now requiring masks on the basis of a decision from a public health official concerned with future outbreaks.”

Expanding on Richard Feynmann’s observation that “science is a belief in the ignorance of experts,” Dr Essex adds that the analytical process is alien to politics. Nevertheless, governing interests rely on data and mathematical model projections to validate a COVID-19 narrative justifying continual state control over freedom of association.

Most alarming is the lack of any “limiting principle” signalling an end to the lockdowns and controls. This is reflected in a similar lack of “limiting principles” regarding the data and models that were used to project alarming and incorrect pandemic statistics.

Dr Essex’s unique analytical perspective on the whole COVID-19 phenomenon raises issues rarely considered. These include: the workings of networks and nodes in the spread and dissipation of coronavirus, the collectivist thinking that inhibits finding solutions, the herd mentality that creates a climate of fear out of “style and fashion,” the “virtuous corruption” practiced for causes believed to be just, and a general lack of common sense in coping with the crisis.

Reassuringly, it’s not necessary to be an ‘expert’ in order to distinguish facts from fictions. As Dr Essex advises, simply applying common sense is far more reliable than “experts” would have us believe. Everyone should stop being afraid, think independently, and direct their efforts towards better understanding the greater context of the COVID-19 pandemic. What better way to arrive at any valid conclusions that are Just Right!

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

666 – COVID-19’s ethical cancer – the morality of altruism

 Comments Off on 666 – COVID-19’s ethical cancer – the morality of altruism
Aug 062020
 

An end to the COVID-19 pandemic will never be found through some future means of defeating the SARS CoV-2 virus. That’s because the COVID-19 pandemic is a politically orchestrated moral pandemic, not a viral one.

Thanks to continued unnecessary lockdowns, the forced wearing of masks and social distancing rules, we now know that our politicians can force arbitrary and irrational restrictions on us without being held accountable for their actions. But worse, we also now know that there are a great many people not only willing to follow their orders without question, but who are eager to help enforce those orders against their fellow citizens.

This is beyond tragedy. At the root of this acceptance of evil lies a widely accepted belief that these actions can all be justified by altruism. “If it only saves one life, it’s all worth it.”

This is a demonstrably immoral argument. For any society this represents an ethical cancer, which just like any cancer if left unchecked eventually destroys the host body. No society can possibly survive on the irrational principle of self-sacrifice.

Nor can any number of COVID-19 ‘model projections,’ or slogans insisting that “we’re all in this together,” possibly justify the suicidal path taken by our politicians and health care officials.

Their prescriptions, all based on unethical manifestations of the Left, have been designed to defeat human nature itself. What’s required is a moral prescription that’s Just Right – one that defends human nature instead of attempting to defeat it.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal