Sep 172020
 


In the absence of any rational justification for them, what the continual lockdown threats and irrational rules surrounding COVID-19 clearly demonstrate is that we currently live under fascist rule. It’s no “creeping” fascism. It’s here. Now.

Like all forms of collectivism, fascism is an ideology of the Left. Generally, those on the Left support continuing the lockdowns and COVID rules while those on the Right favor freedom and individual choice. These Left versus Right competing narratives are clearly distinguishable on the basis of philosophy and ideology.

Labels continually prove to be unavoidable in political discourse because they are both a necessity and a weapon.

When correctly defined instead of being avoided, political labels can become a powerful weapon for the Right and against fascism given fascism’s exclusive association with the Left. Continue reading »

Sep 102020
 

When people object to political “polarization,” what they’re really objecting to is the right to politically disagree. Since all such disagreement is by its nature polarized, this objection itself represents a polarized political position – of the Left. It’s not surprising then that the Left-dominated mainstream media doesn’t want the world to know just how much growing opposition there actually is to the world-wide COVID-19 lockdown measures.

At least two million-plus protesters filled the streets of Berlin Germany on August 29, yet the mainstream media falsely reported their numbers in the low thousands, and dismissed the protesters as “COVID deniers.”

Of course “fake news” is nothing new. Mainstream media has been spreading fake news since the very concept of “news” itself was created. Fake news strives to create the illusion that there is no disagreement with its narrative.

The growing public resistance to the entire COVID-19 “pandemic” lockdowns and forced mask mandates has at last uncovered a political polarity that should not be condemned or resisted but celebrated and embraced.

In the world of politics, ideological electoral options are necessarily binary, leading to a natural polarization of their symbolic terms Left and Right. When objectively and correctly associated with their proper ideologies, the polarized terms of Left and Right can be used as a powerful compass making it possible to steer the ship of state in the right direction.

After all, a political compass must reliably point towards each of the polarized forces of Left and Right before that compass can guide us in the direction that’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

670 – Controlling the COVID narrative – a defining moment in history

 Comments Off on 670 – Controlling the COVID narrative – a defining moment in history
Sep 032020
 


We can confidently place most of the blame for public fear and ignorance about COVID-19 squarely on the mainstream media. This has apparently become the main mission of this propaganda branch of the Left, from which the misinformation originates.

Not surprisingly, those relying on mainstream media remain utterly unaware of the gigantic anti-COVID-19 lockdown protests occurring around the world. And what’s really remarkable, given the flood of up-to-date data and observable evidence to the contrary, a significant number of people still believe that COVID-19 is something to be unusually feared, when it has already statistically proven to be far less deadly than an average flu season.

Much of the media’s misinformation campaign has been intentionally driven by the use of false definitions and fraudulent statistics. Key words and terms continually misrepresented include the following: ‘SARS CoV-2 virus,’ ‘COVID-19,’ ‘pandemic,’ ‘cases,’ ‘deaths,’ and even the word ‘mask’ itself. Thus, confusion reigns.

By far, the most abused term is ‘cases,’ a favored statistic reported daily by propagandists. The question always begs asking, ‘cases’ of what? Rarely are distinctions made between ‘cases’ of ‘COVID-19,’ or ‘cases’ of ‘SARS CoV-2’ or ‘cases’ of ‘deaths,’ or even ‘cases’ they call ‘resolved.’ And it doesn’t help when the term ‘COVID-19 cases’ is used interchangeably with ‘coronavirus cases’ or other such combinations. Confusion persists, all for the lack of definition! Continue reading »

669 – Deference to expertise | Professor Christopher Essex

 Comments Off on 669 – Deference to expertise | Professor Christopher Essex
Aug 272020
 


“Giving one person such power is an example of the anti-democratic deference to expertise in our society.”

That warning conveyed by our guest Dr Christopher Essex, Professor, Dept of Applied Mathematics at the University of Western Ontario, came after observing that “they are now requiring masks on the basis of a decision from a public health official concerned with future outbreaks.”

Expanding on Richard Feynmann’s observation that “science is a belief in the ignorance of experts,” Dr Essex adds that the analytical process is alien to politics. Nevertheless, governing interests rely on data and mathematical model projections to validate a COVID-19 narrative justifying continual state control over freedom of association.

Most alarming is the lack of any “limiting principle” signalling an end to the lockdowns and controls. This is reflected in a similar lack of “limiting principles” regarding the data and models that were used to project alarming and incorrect pandemic statistics.

Dr Essex’s unique analytical perspective on the whole COVID-19 phenomenon raises issues rarely considered. These include: the workings of networks and nodes in the spread and dissipation of coronavirus, the collectivist thinking that inhibits finding solutions, the herd mentality that creates a climate of fear out of “style and fashion,” the “virtuous corruption” practiced for causes believed to be just, and a general lack of common sense in coping with the crisis.

Reassuringly, it’s not necessary to be an ‘expert’ in order to distinguish facts from fictions. As Dr Essex advises, simply applying common sense is far more reliable than “experts” would have us believe. Everyone should stop being afraid, think independently, and direct their efforts towards better understanding the greater context of the COVID-19 pandemic. What better way to arrive at any valid conclusions that are Just Right!

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

666 – COVID-19’s ethical cancer – the morality of altruism

 Comments Off on 666 – COVID-19’s ethical cancer – the morality of altruism
Aug 062020
 

An end to the COVID-19 pandemic will never be found through some future means of defeating the SARS CoV-2 virus. That’s because the COVID-19 pandemic is a politically orchestrated moral pandemic, not a viral one.

Thanks to continued unnecessary lockdowns, the forced wearing of masks and social distancing rules, we now know that our politicians can force arbitrary and irrational restrictions on us without being held accountable for their actions. But worse, we also now know that there are a great many people not only willing to follow their orders without question, but who are eager to help enforce those orders against their fellow citizens.

This is beyond tragedy. At the root of this acceptance of evil lies a widely accepted belief that these actions can all be justified by altruism. “If it only saves one life, it’s all worth it.”

This is a demonstrably immoral argument. For any society this represents an ethical cancer, which just like any cancer if left unchecked eventually destroys the host body. No society can possibly survive on the irrational principle of self-sacrifice.

Nor can any number of COVID-19 ‘model projections,’ or slogans insisting that “we’re all in this together,” possibly justify the suicidal path taken by our politicians and health care officials.

Their prescriptions, all based on unethical manifestations of the Left, have been designed to defeat human nature itself. What’s required is a moral prescription that’s Just Right – one that defends human nature instead of attempting to defeat it.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

650 – Omnipotent State—of emergency

 Comments Off on 650 – Omnipotent State—of emergency
Apr 162020
 


US President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau are moving in opposite directions when it comes to ending the COVID-19 shut down.

“This will be the new normal until a vaccine is developed,” Trudeau was quoted saying in an April 11 National Post report. If so, that would mean a minimum of one to three years, given the usual best time in which a vaccine can be developed.

In contrast, Donald Trump says “I want to get it open as soon as we can; we have to get our country open.” With May 1 targeted as his primary re-opening date, Trump has also gone on record saying he would like to see parts of the country open up even sooner than that.

With COVID-19 statistics falling far short of expectations, and looking more like average or lower than average annual flu numbers, government officials in tandem with the medical profession are warning of a second or third wave, having apparently implied that we have already been through the first wave. Continue reading »

Jan 162020
 


“I call it Climate Change BS and by BS – if I have to spell it out – I mean Bad Science!” concludes our guest Dave Plumb, whose book ‘Inconveniently Screwed’ describes and explains the ‘good’ science behind what we actually do know about climate change and its causes.

In the face of continuing outrageous claims about a pending ‘climate crisis,’ the real science of climate has been replaced by the fake ‘political science’ of Leftist politicians.

Since ‘facts don’t matter’ to those on the Left, the whole climate change debate can become quite frustrating for those who think that facts do matter. The relentless efforts of the Left to continue promoting their climate fiction can only be resisted and defeated by a similar relentless effort on the part of those who have the Right ideas about climate and climate change.

As always, the real climate the Left is talking about – and wants to change – is our political climate. The only consistency to be found in their arguments about climate change is a hatred of individual freedom, capitalism, and of humanity itself. Forced discussions about carbon dioxide and weather concerns are mere distractions from their evil intentions.

With one form of BS (Bad Science) being promoted via another form of BS (Bad Schools), facts are the last thing the Left wants to hear about.

Given the Bad Science being taught in Bad Schools, it would be Just Right to conclude that the politics being used to support and promote those two forms of BS is the BS of the traditional type.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal