Jun 032021
 


In attempting to end our current authoritarian regime and to re-assert individual rights, it might be useful to discover how individuals ever triumphed over authoritarianism in the first place. It is a journey that can take us back to biblical days.

Individualism arose from the collective, not the other way round, asserts our guest Salim Mansur. It arose when individuals began to question authority, a theme illustrated by the story of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Having eaten fruit from the ‘tree of knowledge,’ that knowledge itself produced the phenomenon and recognition of free will and individual choice.

It is a mistake to speak of individualism as if it stands in complete isolation from any collective (not to be confused with collectivism). Paradoxically the terms ‘individualism’ and ‘individual rights’ have absolutely no meaning or context without some identifiable collective against which they can be contrasted – and which enshrines those values as being fundamental to that collective.

Today, many nations, provinces, and other jurisdictions no longer protect or defend the very individual rights that once justified their democratic and legal authority. Instead, their politicians and governments routinely violate these rights. They have apparently discovered that throughout history, fear has been the successful pretext for abridging individual freedom, and it is no different today. Continue reading »

707 – The principles of politics versus the politics of principle

 Comments Off on 707 – The principles of politics versus the politics of principle
May 202021
 


“Freedom! Freedom! Freedom!” That has been an increasing chant heard at ever-growing protests around the world and in Canada, where Ontario’s fascist premier Doug Ford boasts that his is the most locked down jurisdiction in North America.

Sad to say, freedom has never been on the agenda of any political party found in the federal parliament or provincial legislatures of Canada. This is remarkable, given that freedom has always been touted by each of these parties as being a fundamental value of the nation. Yet freedom always takes a back seat to their various collectivist priorities – priorities that simply cannot possibly co-exist with freedom.

Tragically, most of those chanting ‘freedom’ are not really seeking individual freedom because they do not even know what freedom is. Rather, they are desperate to escape their latest version of oppression – currently a pretended ‘viral’ epidemic created to generate fear and to justify the unjustifiable – tyranny.

Though it is true that Canada lacks principled leadership, the real weakness in the Canadian fabric is not to be found in its leaders; it is to be found in Canadians themselves who routinely dismiss supporting the rare political party or politician that would put freedom first. Continue reading »

706 – The bio-logic of bio-warfare—overwhelming us with the evidence

 Comments Off on 706 – The bio-logic of bio-warfare—overwhelming us with the evidence
May 132021
 


To suggest that the so-called ‘COVID vaccines’ are a bio-weapon and/or a population control ‘therapy’ is still considered by most an outrageous conspiratorial theory that only deserves dismissal – not because the theory is unsupportable in fact, but because it is simply unthinkable and too horrifying to accept.

That very reaction demonstrates that those who are attacking Western civilization know exactly what they are doing, and how to disarm their intended victims. They have successfully blinded people to the evidence by drowning them in that evidence.

The continuing failure of most people to understand that what they are experiencing today is not about any viral pandemic is a testament to the success of the propaganda war that parallels the physical one. Even as people question the irrationality and contradictory nature of the lockdowns and police state tactics, they cannot accept the conclusion that their own observations lead them towards.

As they drown in the evidence, most refuse to see what is drowning them. Worse, they have become their own enemies as well as a weapon ‘of’ their real enemies, particularly if they have allowed themselves to be injected with any of the ‘gene therapy’ variants.

Grasping the big picture is an uncomfortable experience, especially when doing so reveals a picture that is terrifying. And the fear of this knowledge is for many greater than their fear of lockdowns and of a viral ‘pandemic.’

But denial has never cured any disease nor ended any pandemic. Unless more people come to accept the evidence of their own senses and draw the conclusions that they know to be Just Right, what they fear today will pale in comparison to what awaits them tomorrow.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

705 – Winning back our freedom—and why philosophy matters

 Comments Off on 705 – Winning back our freedom—and why philosophy matters
May 062021
 


As more and more people ‘awaken’ to the tyrannical reality of the global lockdowns, a great dilemma presents itself.

No matter how many grasp the true nature of our tyranny, or publicly protest, or civilly disobey our tyrannical laws and politicians, or challenge the courts, the sad fact is that all of Canada’s political parties in the parliaments and legislatures of the country are the source of the tyranny. Without a political option that will guarantee individual freedom on principle, our tyranny will never end.

To Canadians who want an end to lockdowns and other tyrannical rules and regulations, there are currently only two political parties in the nation opposed to them on principle.

Federally, the choice is the People’s Party of Canada, under the leadership of Maxime Bernier. And provincially in the province of Ontario, it is the Freedom Party of Ontario under the leadership of Paul McKeever.

While there are a few independents and occasional members in various parliaments who have expressed opposition to the lockdowns, their opposition has not been based on the necessary philosophical principles. Instead their concern has been over issues of ‘democratic process’ or calls for more ‘accurate’ statistics and ‘scientific’ evidence, none of which could ever justify today’s tyranny.

Given these circumstances, things may seem hopeless for those yearning to win back their freedom democratically – at the ballot box. Worse, many believe that their vote would be ‘wasted’ if they voted for a party that has no elected members and whose past vote totals have been in the single digit percentage range. Without a ‘majority’ how can such parties ever win an election?

Answer: it doesn’t take a ‘majority’ of eligible voters to elect a majority government. In fact, as illustrated by Freedom Party leader Paul McKeever in his analysis of the past ten Ontario elections, the elected parties consistently received between 18.2% to 29.7% of eligible voters, most resulting in majority governments.

Given that every other elected political party in Ontario has vowed to keep the lockdowns going indefinitely (even though they have no moral or democratic right to do so), a vote for any of them is a vote for continued tyranny.

Polls are now suggesting that as many as 20% of Ontarians want their freedom back, a percentage that becomes politically significant in light of the reality of past electoral results. Unfortunately this minority is still reluctant to vote for its convictions, blinded by political myths and unaware of how easily circumstances could be reversed.

As we have demonstrated many times in the past, the political world is and has always been ruled by minorities. ‘Majorities’ always follow, they never lead.

Tyranny will never end in our society until a significant minority philosophically commits to a real political option that is always Just Right – freedom.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

704 – The Ford Reich—Ontario’s fascist variant

 Comments Off on 704 – The Ford Reich—Ontario’s fascist variant
Apr 292021
 


When University of Western Ontario professor Donald Welsh compared Ontario’s COVID strategies to the Holocaust, he was roundly condemned by the Ford government’s spokesperson Ivana Yelich: “These inflammatory comments are totally unacceptable. Nothing should ever be compared to the Holocaust.”

And with that, she proved the professor’s case. Indeed, it is a failure to compare today’s events in Ontario with those of the Holocaust (and other similar historical parallels) that should be considered both an intellectual and moral crime. To suggest that ‘nothing’ should ever be compared to the Holocaust is a call to ignore the lessons of history – and to promote totalitarianism and tyranny – two singular realities that have emerged from Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservative Party in Ontario.

Yelich’s statement is also an extraordinary insult to those who suffered under the evil fascist philosophies of the Holocaust – historical versions of the very philosophy and policy of today’s Ford’s government. But most importantly, it was a veiled attempt to prevent looking in the mirror, and to prevent the public from seeing the Ford government in its true philosophical light – fascist.

“For 14 months, we have all been part of a highly dangerous experiment. It was foisted upon us, without consent, by a radical group of public health fundamentalists. These extremists have terrorized civil society and attempted to shut down and destroy free thought,” tweeted Professor Welsh in a perfect and accurate description of a fascist state.

Bravo Professor Welsh! Those who have accused you of expressing ‘offensive’ statements are themselves the ones who are offensive.

We encourage everyone to follow the example of Professor Welsh because he got it Just Right and had the courage to say so.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Apr 222021
 


The global chorus of identical voices emanating from the COVID vaccine propaganda machine has reached a new crescendo. Among those voices is Ontario’s fascist premier Doug Ford who recently turned the province into a literal police state – save for the fact that the police themselves refused to cooperate.

But the fascist efforts continue unabated nonetheless. Even the victims of vaccine propaganda have become propagandists themselves, driven by the very fear and ignorance that the propaganda engendered.

What is particularly startling about all the ‘vaccine’ propaganda is how uncritically so many people accept outright lies and demonstrably false information as being valid. This is beyond tragic, especially considering the thousands upon thousands of adverse reactions to what are not vaccines, but various experimental genetic modifiers (gene therapy) being fraudulently presented to the public as actual vaccines.

The incredible gulf between a growing number of doctors on the health care frontlines and the official medical establishment’s continuing stance on the COVID ‘vaccines’ has revealed an official agenda that warrants criminal sanctions. Officials have grossly and fraudulently inflated the number of deaths caused by COVID while simultaneously grossly and fraudulently deflating the number of deaths and crippling consequences of the vaccines themselves. Continue reading »

702 – UNDRIP and the indigenous question | Ron Vaillant

 Comments Off on 702 – UNDRIP and the indigenous question | Ron Vaillant
Apr 152021
 


The sovereignty of nations is globally under attack, ironically by a group called the United Nations. The attacks are disguised in a myriad of ways, one of the lesser-known being a scheme known as UNDRIP: the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Despite its name, UNDRIP is not about addressing ‘indigenous’ concerns, but about a huge land grab that will affect every resident in Canada. Having conducted his own investigation into UNDRIP, our guest Ron Vaillant was alarmed to discover that there is no definition of ‘indigenous’ in the UN declaration, a curious omission given that the entire document is predicated on actions based on protecting ‘indigenous rights.’

He is now sounding his own alarm about Canada’s Bill C-15 and the 46 Articles of UNDRIP broadly supported by Canadian politicians in upcoming parliamentary votes.

In the inevitable confusion that abounds when essential and fundamental terms are left undefined, it is difficult to see the truth behind the cloud of distractions obscuring our view. It is an inconvenient truth that any government policies based on ‘indigenous rights’ are policies based on the collectivist principle of race and racism.

The proper grounds on which to base land claim settlements rights and governance is the principle of individual rights. It is perpetually Just Right that each individual be accorded freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, and the private property rights necessary in the exercise of such freedoms.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal