Jul 022022
 

Since the end of WWII, a number of international laws and treaties have been created among nations to allow for a more peaceful, if not orderly world. Albeit with many exceptions, these rules of conduct have served the world well. We have enjoyed an extended period of relative peace and have avoided another world war. This sense of security seems to be coming to an end as the West now faces possible military engagement with both Russia in Ukraine and Communist China in Taiwan.

How did we arrive at this point? Since at least the 1960s plans have been formulated and implemented to pave the way for a one-world government led by the United States in a grand hegemony of tyranny marked by corruption, censorship, the surveillance state, and Malthusian population control.

We were warned that this might happen by Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy who, while not knowing precisely what form these nefarious plans might take, knew that it was a distinct possibility that the Military-Industrial Complex could be used with evil intent and on November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas we discovered just how patently evil these people could be.

It is no longer a secret that there is a cabal of advisors orchestrating successive military campaigns throughout the globe of which Ukraine is but the latest.

The greatest opposition the cabal faces in its grand scheme is from countries like Russia which stubbornly adheres to a historic sense of national pride and which warned that it would not tolerate any attempts to alter that perspective.

In a direct challenge to any who would oppose them we have seen callous rogues like Johnson, the Bushes, Clinton, Obama, and a group of neoconservative policy advisors, take that once moral and enviable of nations, the United States of America, and transform it into a juggernaut of death and destruction.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Jun 302022
 


Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v Wade it has become clear that we are now wading into another row – over abortion. And as usual, those on the Left are reacting irrationally and violently, while those on the Right are wrestling with their own consciences over the moral implications of abortion.

The inconvenient reality concerning the unborn is that during pregnancy, two human lives occupy the same space at the same time. If one assumes that the unborn have rights, this creates an unavoidable contradiction given that such rights would conflict with those of the mother – in whose body the unborn child exists.

But this contradiction is illusionary because another inconvenient reality is that the unborn are not capable of having “rights” – nor, for that matter, are children. To confer “rights” upon either group is a meaningless gesture given that actual rights are attached both to responsibilities and to the freedom of action necessary to exercise them.

In this context, a more appropriate and accurate term to apply to children and the unborn is “status.” This is no mere exercise in semantics. The “status” of children and other individuals incapable of exercising rights (such as the mentally ill or severely physically disabled) is subordinate to those assigned with the rights and responsibilities for their care – and under whose rights they are protected. Continue reading »

Jun 232022
 


The death toll from the mandated “Covid” vaccines is simply staggering. Even more staggering is how government officials, politicians, and the state-funded medical establishment can completely ignore the deaths and injuries of millions while continuing to prescribe and mandate the instrument of their deaths.

To avoid this reality – and their direct responsibility for causing these deaths – they have invented the term “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” (SADS). Worse, thanks to analysis of data accumulated over the years following the introduction of mass vaccinations in the 1960s, it now appears that this evasion of reality and responsibility was also behind the invention of the term “Sudden Infant Death Syndrome” (SIDS).

“For everybody out there that’s bragging that they’ve been vaccinated and they don’t have symptoms, what they don’t realize is that’s the equivalent of not waking up in a house fire.”

Dr Tau Braun’s chilling observation is but one of many similar statements made by a growing number of doctors, researchers, scientists and even undertakers, thanks to data now clearly available which consistently demonstrates a link between “vaccinations” and “sudden” deaths. The only way politicians can hide from this truth is through censorship, propaganda, and other coercive means. And that’s exactly what they are planning to do.

“The only things you should be frightened of are your governments’ reactions to this alleged threat, and the vaccines themselves,” warns former Pfizer chief (respiratory) science officer Dr Mike Yeadon. SADly, he’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Jun 092022
 


The sudden absence of the state funded media’s news coverage and commentary on the Uvalde Texas school shootings was telling. Following days of news reports that were completely contradictory with each subsequent report, the coverage suddenly stopped.

However, what did remain consistent with each day’s news update were calls for gun control and for the disarming of the nation. But then even those stopped, following revelations that the proper and legal use of guns could easily have prevented the unnecessary deaths of 19 innocent school children.

Sadness and anger over the events as they appear to have transpired at the Robb Elementary School can be overwhelming. The utter incompetence overtly displayed by authorities overseeing the shootings has led to serious speculation that there’s much more than ‘incompetence’ at play.

Indeed, previous mass school shootings are being closely scrutinized and it appears that they all seem to have certain disturbing elements and patterns in common. To put it bluntly: Were calls for gun controls a consequence of the shootings, or were the shootings a consequence of the gun control agenda?

It’s a disarming narrative, either way you look at it. And ‘disarming’ is certainly the best way to describe the phenomenon of mass school shootings in a way that’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

761 – Canada’s foreign rationale on foreign policy | Salim Mansur

 Comments Off on 761 – Canada’s foreign rationale on foreign policy | Salim Mansur
Jun 022022
 


In light of the history and status of Canada in the geopolitical world conveyed by our guest Salim Mansur, Canada’s current involvement in Ukraine makes it clear that its foreign policy has not been crafted in the interests of Canadians.

Without any due process or public debate, the Canadian government has joined the United Nations’ globalist effort to cause a “regime change” in Russia. “Putin and his henchmen are war criminals,” outrageously declared Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, in projecting her own culpability in supporting Ukraine’s neo-nazis onto Putin.

Canada has no legitimate role in Ukraine that serves either the interests or security of Canadians. Worse, Canada is supporting the true war criminals in the Ukraine conflict. Without a clearly defined foreign policy that puts Canada first, suggests Salim, Canada will be forever acting in the interests of a globalist agenda.

It seems that “foreign to reason” may be the simplest way to describe Canada’s foreign policy in a way that’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

760 – Projecting a state of freedom | Derek Proulx

 Comments Off on 760 – Projecting a state of freedom | Derek Proulx
May 262022
 


“Live free or die” is the state motto of New Hampshire, and our guest Derek Proulx, a volunteer with the Free State Project elaborates: “…for death is not the worst of evils – slavery is.”

The strategy behind the project depends upon attracting a significant number of liberty-minded activists to a single state, one with a low enough population to effectively enable them to lobby and influence the local culture so as to elect more freedom-oriented political representatives to local governments.

Remarkably, there are other similar projects springing up, such as one now underway in Alberta involving the separation of that province from the rest of Canada. Its proponents argue that Alberta must be freed from the tyranny and “abuse” of the federal government.

But why these strategies? It appears the realization that freedom-loving people are a minority is causing many of them to create a refuge from the submissive majority. The success of their efforts is being measured against how well a particular ‘free state’ can maintain its independence and freedom segregated from the majority culture.

In the short run, this strategy can be judged successful but the greater challenge – and long term danger – still remains. A free state cannot long co-exist next to a tyrannical state, let alone within one, as is the case with provinces and states within their republics or confederations. History and logic both demonstrate that the more dominant state will inevitably rule the smaller.

Thus the necessity of inculcating a philosophy and deep understanding of the nature of individual freedom remains an eternal task, one that must be directed beyond the confines of a segregated jurisdiction
. Establishing a universal awareness and appreciation of freedom’s profound virtue and benefits is a cultural pre-requisite towards establishing any free state – or free nation – or free world – in a manner that’s Just Right.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

759 – It’s party time in Ontario—the freedom to party and a party to freedom | Paul McKeever | Mike McMullen

 Comments Off on 759 – It’s party time in Ontario—the freedom to party and a party to freedom | Paul McKeever | Mike McMullen
May 192022
 


When it comes to Ontario’s 2022 provincial election now under way, it appears that there are more politicians wanting the freedom to party than there are who want a party to freedom.

Considering the number of political parties now registered in the province of Ontario, it’s alarming to realize that only one is a party to freedom. That party is the Freedom Party of Ontario (FPO) and its leader Paul McKeever (also FPO’s candidate in London North Centre) joins us to describe why this is so.

Along the way, Paul offers a history of Freedom Party and of the Ontario government’s persistent manipulation of the electoral system – and of political parties – since FPO’s founding in 1984.

On the federal front it’s much the same story, where the only party to freedom is the People’s Party of Canada (PPC). Past PPC candidate for London West, Mike McMullen, joins us to describe why he also feels comfortable now running as a provincial 2022 candidate for Freedom Party in his same riding.

Having participated in provincial candidate debates, both Paul and Mike have noticed how any discussion of the government’s pandemic response over the past few years is being entirely avoided by the other parties, and how they’re all desperately pretending it’s politics as usual. Most noticeable is the absence of any Progressive Conservative (PC) candidates at the debates, particularly given that the ruling PC party is the party most responsible for the government’s mishandling of the entire pandemic controversy.

Calling for the government to be held accountable for its incredible violations of individual freedom during the past few years is a key objective of Freedom Party’s 2022 election platform appropriately titled: Truth Rights Justice Freedom.

It’s also why, as the party’s own literature proclaims, Freedom Party is Ontario’s only party that’s “Just Right for Ontario.”

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal