Jul 022020
 

It’s remarkable how the mainstream media continues to avoid reporting many of the significant and essential truths and details about Black Lives Matter (BLM). The fact that BLM is avowedly Marxist, racist, and openly advocates criminal behavior is intentionally ignored or downplayed in mainstream media reports.

What matters most to the ‘fake estate’ is how ‘racist’ white people are, how ‘racist’ police officers are, how ‘racist’ America’s history is, how ‘racist’ Western culture is, how ‘racist’ capitalism is, how ‘racist’ individual freedom is, how ‘racist’ people who disagree with Leftist narratives are, how ‘racist’ Donald Trump is, how ‘racist’ monuments to the founders of the freest nations on the planet are, how ‘racist’ voter ID cards are, how ‘racist’ the Right is, how ‘racist’ national borders are, and of course, how ‘racist’ those who don’t support BLM and ‘fighting racism’ are.

Of course, the real racists among us are those fueling the flames of racism by promulgating these lies and ideological fallacies. With the help of the ‘fake estate,’ BLM has been able to attract the support of many ‘good people,’ and in so doing has been able to use them for its own ends. BLM’s vows to fight racism and racial hatred sound like a noble cause until one realizes that BLM has an entirely different agenda – complete disruption and chaos. For this Marxist criminal organization, playing the racist card is a distraction calculated to prevent opposition to its real agenda: the destruction of Western culture.

It is vital that more ‘good people’ do what’s Just Right: help expose and condemn BLM for what it truly is and demand that our politicians protect and defend the values of a free society, not a Marxist one.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Jun 252020
 

Black Lives Matter (BLM) is an avowedly racist, fascist, nihilistic, violent and terrorist movement, yet most of its followers claim to be against these things. This should not be surprising since the mainstream media keeps repeating that BLM is opposed to racism. But ‘fighting racism’ is not BLM’s objective; in fact, fueling the fires of racism is the very tactic that allows BLM to advocate anarchy and violence with minimal resistance.

Destroying the capitalist system and instituting a Marxist form of state control is the openly declared goal of BLM’s leaders. “I’m not here to peacefully protest. I’m here to disrupt until my demands are met. You cannot rebuild until we break it all down – by any means necessary! A response to violence is not violence itself.” So proclaimed one of BLM’s leaders in defense of the violent protests and riots.

What makes the whole spectacle so disturbing is that these open threats of violence and the inherent racism fueling the protests themselves are not being adequately identified and condemned.

Perhaps that’s because too many good people have become paralyzed by the evil ideology that drives groups like BLM: we call it ‘Original Skin’, a racist version of ‘Original Sin.’ This doctrine holds that one can be proclaimed guilty of actions and events that occurred before one’s birth – based on the color of his/her skin! How much more racist can you get? Yet this is what BLM’s leaders keep demanding.

Particularly for white people who must bear the ‘white guilt’ demanded by BLM, the fear of not only being labeled racist, but of losing one’s job for the expression of any opinion opposing BLM creates the psychological terror that protects BLM from criticism and moral condemnation. But as commentator Glenn Beck recently lamented regarding the lack of voices speaking out against the chaos, “silence is consent.”

In that light, let us be reminded of the principle that “to those who consent, no injustice is done.” Like it or not, that’s Just Right because it is true and the truth is ultimately inescapable.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Jun 182020
 

The COVID-19 lockdown and school closures may have unintentionally created a golden opportunity for parents to reclaim and guide the education of their children. And considering some of the outrageous post-COVID plans for our schools, keeping those schools locked down may be preferable.

Thanks to the lockdown (and in some part because of regular teacher strikes plaguing state education), politicians and state educators have actually been encouraging parents to homeschool their children until the schools re-open – whenever that might possibly be. This is ironic, given the growing state trend to ban homeschooling, as has already been done in many European nations such as Germany.

Indeed, Harvard law professor Elizabeth Bartholet has called for a presumptive ban on homeschooling in the United States, and for the state having a similar presumptive authority over parental rights. Arguing that parents are “authoritarian,” she seems oblivious to the authoritarianism of all things state-controlled and monopolized. We can expect these collectivist ideas to frame the coming debate over parental rights as we head into the future.

“The only purpose of education,” wrote philosopher-novelist Ayn Rand, “is to teach a student how to live his life – by developing his mind and equipping him to deal with reality.” If that’s so, then state education completely fails the test. Far too many dysfunctional and illiterate ‘graduates’ of state education are not even capable of apprehending reality, let alone dealing with it.

Perhaps now is an ideal time to reconsider some of our basic assumptions and attitudes towards what is being called ‘public education’ and to also re-consider the most effective schooling alternative that long preceded compulsory state education: homeschooling.

It would be Just Right by us if more parents chose to homeschool or otherwise seek alternative schooling – even if only inspired by the COVID-19 lockdown.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

Jun 112020
 


The wearing of COVID-19 masks has become ideally symbolic of the Left’s hypocrisy thanks to the George Floyd riots and protests – public demonstrations that have little to do with either Floyd or with racism. Criminality aside, it was impossible not to notice that ‘protesters’ were neither ‘social distancing’ nor wearing masks. Crowds were massive.

Despite all their threats regarding the spreading of the SARS CoV-2 virus (ranging from fines to imprisonment), officials did nothing. The mainstream media celebrated the events.

Indeed, the very politicians and media pundits who scolded law-abiding peaceful citizens for daring to take their children to the playground or take walks in the park joined the mobs themselves and otherwise commended the ‘protesters’ for their criminal actions and evil objective – nihilism.

Professor Salim Mansur has likened the organized riots and violence to the wanton destruction perpetrated by Adolf Hitler on his own people when he realized that Germany was about to lose the war. Continue reading »

May 282020
 

More than being a demonstrated lifesaving treatment in fighting the COVID-19 virus (SARS CoV-2), hydroxychloroquine has now become a symbol of the fundamental political divide regarding the government-mandated lockdown.

Donald Trump’s recent announcement that he is personally using hydroxychloroquine was a direct challenge to negative mainstream media narratives about the drug. It was also a direct attack against those on the Left determined to keep the COVID-19 lockdown in effect for as long as possible, no matter how many people may die or suffer in the process.

In many jurisdictions around the world, it may appear that the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown is slowly ending, but the reality is that it is incrementally being extended – indefinitely – as politicians seek to entrench their recently exercised undemocratic powers over the rest of us. Political threats to repeatedly shut down areas of the economy on the basis of future COVID-19 statistics means that the economy may never be able to recover.

Tragically, at the root of all the shutdown strategies lies a single priority: the protection of healthcare ‘systems,’ a priority placed above that of protecting the lives of the people forced to deal with those systems. When the pandemic began, ‘flattening the curve’ to prevent hospitals from being overrun was the first and only stated objective of the shutdown. Today, the continued rationale for the shutdown is anybody’s guess, as it can change by the hour, and often does. But the priority hasn’t changed even though politicians insist their motivations are based on ‘saving lives.’

By placing the public spotlight on his use of hydroxychloroquine, Trump boldly demonstrated how ‘saving lives’ is not the goal of the mainstream media or the Left. Once again, Trump brilliantly did what was Just Right: he exposed the hypocrisy of those who claim to be motivated by ‘saving lives’ while simultaneously opposed to the use of that which is life-saving.

If you found this presentation valuable please consider supporting us:
🧡 PayPal

655 – Pandemic government and the virus of altruism

 Comments Off on 655 – Pandemic government and the virus of altruism
May 212020
 

On coronavirus, the contrast between what we’ve been told by the official medical establishment and a growing number of front-line health care professionals can no longer be avoided.

In fact, it appears that much of the advice promoted by our politicians and medical bureaucrats is diametrically opposed to that being given by many doctors and virologists directly involved with, and on, the frontlines of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Most confusing are the polarized opinions regarding ‘social distancing’ and the wearing of ‘protective’ masks.

Officialdom says social distancing and physical isolation are necessary to slow the virus, while the ‘front-liners’ say that social distancing and physical isolation actually make people more susceptible, not only to the SARS CoV-2 virus but to a whole host of other viruses and potential diseases.

Officialdom says wearing masks in public is recommended for safety whereas the ‘front-liners’ argue that wearing masks is not healthy for those who wear them. This practice, too, can lead to one becoming more vulnerable to all viruses. Continue reading »

654 – The ‘not normal’ — still living under the COVID-19 lockdown

 Comments Off on 654 – The ‘not normal’ — still living under the COVID-19 lockdown
May 142020
 

What’s being described as a possible post-COVID-19 ‘new normal’ should instead be called ‘the not normal.’

Global vaccine advocate Bill Gates insists that “Normalcy only returns when we’ve largely vaccinated the entire global population.” If so, then normalcy will never return and ‘not normal’ will be a permanent condition under which we will be forced to live.

Despite promises that a vaccine to combat SARS CoV-2 will eventually be developed, there is a growing body of expertise warning that this goal may never be reached. Among them is Doctor Judy Mikovits who works in the field of developing immune therapies: “There is no vaccine currently on the schedule for any RNA virus that works.”

For expressing these and other opinions that do not reflect the official narrative on the pandemic shutdown, many have found their voices being suppressed on social media. For example, YouTube recently removed the video featuring California doctors Erickson and Massihi from its platform, and then later removed the video featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits. Continue reading »